In the case at hand, Olympus filed a petition for review against the decision of the Board of Appeal to revoke Olympus’ patent. Olympus argued that it had had no opportunity to comment on the grounds for this decision as it had never received the statement of the grounds of appeal and the invitation to comment on them from the European Patent Office. The Enlarged Board of Appeal agreed with Olympus, holding that – in the absence of any evidence that the EPO had sent the documents – the circumstances of the case qualify as a fundamental violation of the right to be heard and that for that reason the appeal proceedings should be re-opened. This is the first case under the new review procedure provided by the EPC 2000 in which the Enlarged Board of Appeal orders reopening of an appeal procedure.

The full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.


To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law

The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF