Procedure

Case Law, Covid-19, Damages, Electrical Engineering, Enforcement, evidence, Infringement, Inventive step, Kluwer Patent Cases, Legal costs, Litigation, Patents, Procedure, United Kingdom

, (Bristows)/ /Leave a comment

As many readers will already know, two new full-time Patents Judges have been appointed to the English Court in the last 9 months – Meade and Mellor JJ.  Despite the challenges that the global pandemic has brought, the English Patents Court has coped remarkably well and there has been no let-up in the progress of…

Case Law, FRAND, Kluwer Patent Cases, Litigation, Patents, Procedure, SEP, United Kingdom

(Bristows)/ /Leave a comment

On Wednesday 16 June 2021, Mr Justice Mellor handed down his judgment in the second technical trial in the Mitsubishi & Sisvel v OnePlus & Xiaomi proceedings ([2021] EWHC 1639 (Pat)), holding that the patents in suit were valid and essential to the LTE standard. The proceedings had been brought in an attempt to persuade…

Case Law, EPC, EPO, Litigation, Netherlands, Procedure, Validity

(Brinkhof)/ /16 Comments

The interplay between EPO and national proceedings may take various forms. The Technical Board of Appeal revoking a European Patent during European-wide litigation is one of the more dramatic examples. The EPO’s stay of the grant of an application following an entitlement claim (an ‘entitlement torpedo’) another one. And then there is the central limitation…

Guidelines, Legal costs, Litigation, Netherlands, Procedure, Reimbursement

(Brinkhof)/ /2 Comments

What is it with the Dutch and money? How much truth is there in the cliché that the Dutch are cheap? Do we really get back to business after a romantic diner and split the bill to the cent? Where does this ‘going Dutch’ come from? That term, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, connects…

Case Law, evidence, France, IP Management, Litigation, Patents, Procedure

(Ipsilon)/

It’s an understatement to say that it’s not always very easy to be a French patent litigator in a transnational litigation, in any case a good dose of humor is needed: how many jokes have I heard about our jurisdictional system? Then you have to accept that France is almost systematically considered as the territory…

Case Law, evidence, France, Infringement, Injunction, IP Management, Litigation, Patents, Procedure

(Ipsilon)/

It’s an understatement to say that it’s not easy to be a French patent litigator in transnational litigation, in any case a good dose of humor is needed: how many jokes have I heard about our jurisdictional system? Then you have to accept that France is almost systematically considered as the territory at the bottom…

(Indirect) infringement, Case Law, Equivalents, evidence, Kluwer Patent Cases, Legislation, Litigation, Patents, Pharma, Pharmaceutical patent, Prior art, Procedure, Scope of protection, Sufficiency of disclosure, United Kingdom, Validity

(Bristows)/ /1 Comment

As reported in last week’s post, on 20 January 2021 Birss J handed down what may be his last first instance decision before his elevation to the Court of Appeal.  The first post on the judgment considered the issues of identifying the skilled person, insufficiency and infringement.  This second part considers the decision relating to…

(Cross-border) jurisdiction, Case Law, CJEU, FRAND, Litigation, Procedure, SEP

(Ipsilon)/ /9 Comments

I have the pleasure and the honor of welcoming today Professor Anne-Catherine Chriariny. Professor Chiariny teaches Patent Law and International Private Law at the University of Montpellier. She is notably the author of a famous doctoral thesis on international patent litigation awarded by the Prix Pierre Véron and the Prix Cercle Montesquieu in 2007, published in…

(Indirect) infringement, Case Law, Equivalents, evidence, Kluwer Patent Cases, Legislation, Litigation, Patents, Pharma, Pharmaceutical patent, Prior art, Procedure, Scope of protection, Sufficiency of disclosure, United Kingdom, Validity

(Bristows)/ /1 Comment

On 20 January 2021 Birss J handed down what may be his last first instance decision before he takes his place in the Court of Appeal.  If that turns out to the case then Illumina Cambridge Limited v Latvia MGI Tech SIA and others is a substantial judgment to mark this departure.  In this case…