Exceptions to patentability

Some inventions cannot be patented. According to the WIPO this is necessary ‘in order to strike the right balance between the interests of the right holders, third parties and the public’. According to Article 53 of the European Patent Convention (EPC) European patents shall not be granted in respect of inventions the commercial exploitation of which would be contrary to “ordre public” or morality (..); plant or animal varieties or essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals; (…) methods for treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy and diagnostic methods practised on the human or animal body.

(Indirect) infringement, Chemical Engineering, EPC, Exceptions to patentability, France, Inventive step, Novelty, Revocation, Second Medical Use, Sufficiency of disclosure, Validity

(Véron & Associés)/

On 20 March 2012, the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris rendered its decision in the case relating to raloxifene, a molecule useful for treating or preventing osteoporosis in post-menopausal women, opposing Teva to Eli Lilly. This decision raises many questions, first concerning drug patents in particular (patentability of second medical use, patentability of the resolution of…

Exceptions to patentability, United States of America

(Foley&Lardner LLP)/

On March 20, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., holding that Prometheus’ claims directed to methods of optimizing the dose of specific drugs used in the treatment of specific conditions are invalid under 35 USC § 101 because they impermissibly claim laws of nature….

Exceptions to patentability, Novelty, Sufficiency of disclosure, United Kingdom, Validity

(Bristows)/

The English High Court has upheld the decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office to refuse the grant of a patent for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with zinc (El-Tawil v The Comptroller General of Patents [2012] EWHC 185 (Ch)). Although the case does not break new ground, it provides a useful review…

Case Law, EPC, Exceptions to patentability, Inventive step

/

The Board of Appeal had to decide whether the showing of results of a database analysis as a tree diagram could contribute to the technical character of the invention. The Board of Appeal pointed out that in this case one should take a wider view of the term “presentation of information” than just the actual…

Case Law, Exceptions to patentability, Revocation, Spain

(Clifford Chance)/

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal , dismissing a revocation action against the patent in suit, which protected the calcium salt of atorvastatin. The Supreme court held that (i) the Bolar provision does not apply with retrospective effect, because its origin and rationale is different from the Experimental Use Exception; and (ii.) an invention that…

Biologics, EPC, Exceptions to patentability, Germany

(Krieger Mes Graf & v. der Groeben)/

This long awaited ECJ decision concerns the interpretation of the term “embryo” in the Biotech Directive (98/44/EC). According to the Court Art. 6 (2c) of the Directive excludes the patentability of use of human embryos for commercial or industrial purposes, and only use for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes which is applied to the embryo for…

Exceptions to patentability, Poland, Validity

(Allen & Overy)/ /1 Comment

Can a valid European patent be declared invalid in Poland? In other words, can a computer-implemented invention for which a European patent has already been granted be refused a patent by the Polish Patent Office? While this may sound contradictory, it is in fact common practice – not only in the Polish Patent Office but…

Case Law, Exceptions to patentability, Germany, Validity

(Krieger Mes Graf & v. der Groeben)/

The Court of Appeal discusses and builds on its previous case law on patentability regarding the issue of whether the subject matter is considered a technical invention. The Court emphasizes that it is sufficient if only part of the patented teaching concerns a technical problem. However,  as the next step it has to be determined…

Case Law, Exceptions to patentability

(V.O.)/

A method claim comprising a step of “providing a donor flow channel for conveying fluid to and from a donor” was found to be excluded from patentability as treatment by surgery and therapy. The Board derived from the description that this step required performing venipuncture and found that venipuncture required professional medical expertise to be…

Case Law, Exceptions to patentability

(V.O.)/

Faced with a claim directed at a method for determining airway pressure levels, the Board isolated a step from the claim that required changing the airway pressure of an artificial ventilator to observe certain responses. The Board found that this step could not be distinguished from what a medical doctor would do in order to…