This long awaited ECJ decision concerns the interpretation of the term “embryo” in the Biotech Directive (98/44/EC). According to the Court Art. 6 (2c) of the Directive excludes the patentability of use of human embryos for commercial or industrial purposes, and only use for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes which is applied to the embryo for its benefit is patentable. The court leaves it to the national courts to determine in the light of the current technical developments whether and under which conditions stem cells obtained from a human embryo at the blastocyst stage qualify as an embryo in the sense of the Directive. Furthermore, the court held that Art. 6 (2c) of the Directive excludes an invention from patentability if the technical teaching which is the subject matter of the patent application requires prior destruction of human embryos or their use as starting material, even if the use of human embryos is not specifically mentioned in the description of the application.

Click here for the full text of this case. A summary of this case will be posted on


To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law

The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF