It was within the discretion of the trial court to deny leave to amend a complaint because the proposed amendment, like the complaint it was intended to cure, failed to specifically identify the accused products.
An inventor failed to show any error in the trial court’s refusal to consider his Third Amended Complaint asserting patent infringement claims against Amazon.com, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held. This complaint, like the ones prior to it, did not specifically identify the accused products (Huang v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 24-1428 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 28, 2025)).
Case date: 28 January 2025
Case number No. 24-1428
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law
________________________
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.
