Although the grounds of the decision under R. 111(2) EPC do not have to deal in detail with all the arguments of the parties, at least the key points of discussion must be addressed. The grounds must respond to the relevant facts, evidence and arguments and contain the logical chain that led to the formation of the final judgment.
Proceedings before the EPO are governed by the principle of uniformity of the language of the proceedings. For the written copy of the decision, only the language of the proceedings shall be used. Only the decision in a single language of the proceedings meets the requirements of R. 111(2) EPC on the grounds of the decision.
Under Art. 125 EPC, in so far as the EPC does not contain procedural provisions, the principles of procedural law generally accepted in the contracting states of the European Patent Organisation must be used. This applies in particular to the general principle of fair trial, which is also exemplified in Article 6(1) of the ECHR, which serves as a general guideline for setting up the proceedings. This includes the requirement to draft the decision in such a way that it can be understood by a party that is able to handle the language of the proceedings.
Case date: 12 April 2021
Case number: T 1787/16
Court: European Patent Office (EPO), Board of Appeal
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.
_____________________________
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.
Kluwer IP Law
The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?
Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.
