The Central Staff Committee of the European Patent Office and the trade union SUEPO have called for a strike on Tuesday 15 December 2020 during the meeting of the Administrative Council. SUEPO has announced the strike will be the start of a year of social conflict to defend the future of the Staff and their families.
In a letter to EPO personnel today, the CSC called upon colleagues to join the strike: “Regrettably, we can only report a continued erosion of our work package, an erosion that has even accelerated during these times of pandemic.
All the while, our President maintains that the staff he meets are happy, that social dialogue is working at full speed and that all is going well in EPO-land (our production has not suffered, even today). This is in stark contrast to the emails, phone calls and messages we keep receiving by many colleagues who are increasingly suffering from the unabated production pressure and management by spreadsheet, topped up by the social isolation due to the pandemic.”
The strike had been called for last week by SUEPO in a letter to its members. It makes clear that social dialogue at the EPO has not improved, let alone flourished, under the presidency of António Campinos, although he managed to settle a number of conflicts with former staff members and SUEPO leaders who had been fired or demoted in the years of the authoritarian Benoît Battistelli.
The SUEPO letter shows social conflict is still rife at the EPO: “During this year of pandemic our management has not hesitated to continue the attacks on our working conditions: Education allowance, career, contracts. The attack on our salaries and pensions through the application of an imposed Salary Adjustment Procedure (SAP) is the latest and more brutal attack on all of us. It produces a cut of real salaries (purchasing power) and pensions of roughly 3%. This is only the first year of the application of the SAP. More cuts are only a matter of time. If not fixed, this SAP mechanism will melt our salaries and pensions (-25% in 10 years, and -50% in 20 years, if we have similar adjustments in the future)
The EPO is a rich Organisation. Even in this year of pandemic the EPO will make hundreds of millions of Euro benefits. With the current cut of our salaries and pensions the management has declared they will retain a further 1 billion Euro only in 5 years from cuts on salaries and pensions. This money taken from our salaries will be used to make the already huge pile money of the EPOTIF even bigger. Billions of Euros invested in the stock exchange! This constitutes an anomaly for a public institution such as the EPO, only because its managers pretend to play investment bankers in a crazy game of Monopoly. Enough is enough.
Contempt for staff and representation. Management seems to believe that Staff of the EPO is in a state of paralysis and will not react, no matter how hard they will be hit, as if the pandemic would have anesthetised our senses. Only that can explain the current attacks after years of loyal and competent work. Indeed, year after year, Council meeting after Council meeting, managers and Heads of Delegations keep praising the results of our work, the great working atmosphere, the huge production with ever reducing working staff. Only to come some days later with new and inventive attacks on our working conditions. Changes are always imposed, making a mockery of the consultation with Staff Representatives. For the president this is only a power game where he has all the cards. We are tired of being always the losers of this game. We don’t want to play your game Mr Campinos: Enough is enough.
SUEPO is decided to fight this new attack. The future of the Staff, the stability for our families, the respect of the engagements made (pensions, careers, schools) are more important that the big pile of cash the president wishes to have as a new toy. Nobody should play with our salaries and our pensions. Enough is enough. We propose to staff to stand up and face these attacks. 2021 will be a year of social conflict until these attacks cease and what has been stolen returns to its legitim owners. To start this social conflict, we propose to send a strong signal: One day of strike of all staff of the EPO during the plenum of the Administrative Council on 15 December. (…)”
Open letter CSC about settlement of disputes
In the meantime, the Central Staff Committee not only joined the call for a strike but also sent an open letter today to the chairman and members of the Administrative Council, urging them to do something about the problems with the settlement of disputes at the EPO.
“The current state of the legal means available to the staff of the EPO under Article 13 EPC for the settlement of disputes between the European Patent Organisation and its employees is a cause for serious concern. Numerous changes to the internal means of appeal have been introduced (…) The completely intransparent selection procedure and the unilateral appointment resulted in staff having little to no confidence in the internal appeals system, in the opinions delivered by the internal Appeals Committee and the decisions based thereupon. Despite several requests from the Staff Representation to be re-involved in the selection procedure (see enclosure), the term of office of the chair and vice-chairs apparently was renewed in October 2020. (…) The chance of involving the Staff Committee and thereby help to restore staff’s confidence in the internal appeals system has thus been missed for three more years.
Almost six years after the introduction of the new career system and numerous appeals resulting from it, not a single substantive decision has yet been taken by the President on that matter – despite the numerous changes in the internal appeals system allegedly aimed at increasing its effectiveness. Since the question of the legality of the new career system is of central importance for all staff members and for the Organisation, such a long procedural delay in such an important matter could at this point be considered as denial of justice. (…)
The disputes on the provisions relating to the abolition of the lump payment in case of invalidity as amended in March 2015 (CA/D 2/15) share a similar fate. Although the internal Appeals Committee delivered several opinions in June 2020, the President has still not decided on all cases. This seriously delays the complainants’ access to the ILOAT.
As no agreement could be reached on the salary adjustment procedure, the recent decision CA/D 4/20 and its implementation will lead again to a vast number of litigation cases. This will further increase the burden on the internal appeals system and probably on the ILOAT.
The ILOAT already has a large backlog of several hundred complaints filed against the EPOrg. The ILO governing body stated on several occasions that the high number of cases from the EPOrg impairs the effective and unimpeded functioning of the ILOAT in the interest of all international organisations that have recognized the jurisdiction of the ILOAT. It has therefore limited the number of EPOrg cases dealt with in each session to about 30 to 40 and is considering further measures.
This has a detrimental effect to legal certainty and legal peace and could result in that the means of legal redress available to EPO staff for labour disputes may no longer be considered being sufficient and the immunity from national jurisdiction of the EPOrg may thus be at stake.”
The Central Staff Committee has urged the Administrative Council to work towards reforming the internal means for appeal; to further increase significantly the resources of the internal Appeals Committee and its members; to ensure unhindered access to legal redress for all employees; and to urgently enter into discussions with ILOAT (…) to ensure that all complaints are dealt with expeditiously.
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.
Kluwer IP Law
The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?
Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.
abandon the EPC! Viva national law!
The cash injection system in the SSP and this Salary Adjustment Prreform change the working atmosphere at the EPO from a golden cage to a menagement heaven based on employees hell.
When the new president took office in July 2018 his mandate from the AC was to restore social peace. Now half way through his mandate, the only possible conclusion is that this aim is far of being achieved. One could even say that he has failed.
Whilst his predecessor was very distant and arrogant, he appeared friendlier. But this was only a façade and reality hit the staff quicker than it wished.
One wonders what his hidden agenda could be. One obvious possibility is to continue the destruction of the EPO started by its predecessor. This is prima facie the only logical conclusion. But who would profit from it? National offices? The UPC? Those are possibilities, but this means that the EPC and the EPO have had their best time.
He continues to do everything to render the EPO less attractive as an employer. Who wants to leave its country of origin, leaving behind its social security system and pension scheme, to come to Munich or The Hague with the risk of being fired after 5 years, be it in the first instance or in the boards of appeal? This is the more so if a potential candidate has a family. The EPO is not any longer a worthwhile employer.
The recruitment might become very local as at least the family of those recruits will not have any change in their way of living. Other recruits could be young people, fresh from university, and merely coming from countries which have not reached the standard of living from Germany or The Netherlands. I do not doubt their capacities, it is just that recruitment becomes lopsided and this is never good. It would be interesting to have a distribution of staff by nationality, be it in DG1 or in the BA.
On top of this the head of the EPO takes pretext of a revenue gap to further diminish the salaries and pensions. The whole financial study leading to this conclusion is a mere fake and any reasonable person will see that the starting assumptions can only have come to mind in a twisted brain.
Not only have a study by a renowned accountancy firm hired by the staff representation but also a deep analysis by the Pensioner’s Association shown how unrealistic the “financial” study is. The instruction to the firm chosen by the EPO was clearly to come to the conclusion that there will be a deep financial gap.
One of the assumptions is that the EPO, after a 4% fee increase for 2020, there will be no further fee increases from then on till 2038! In parallel the salaries will grow and hence an enormous deficit is foreseeable. Simply ludicrous!
The whole scenario reminds me of a French expression saying that if you want to kill your dog, you claim it has caught rabies.
The problem of the EPO is that the AC does not play its role. The tail is wagging the dog and the immunity given for good reasons to the EPO is being misused and has ended up with a feeling of impunity. The EPO has become a playground for would be managers and their minions, and the worse is that they manage the EPO as it was their property and with methods which go back to the 19th century.
No wonder staff wants to react. One can only support their action. Forcing most of the staff in home office does not mean that it cannot react to what is to be considered as a disgrace.
One thing appearing already is that the trail of destruction started by the former head of the EPO is aggravated by its successor. Is this what the users of the European Patent system want? I would expect a reaction from the profession as a whole and not merely by some individuals. Folks, it is your future which is at stake as well. It is high time to realise it!
Comments are closed.