It is difficult to predict a new timeline for the start of the Unified Patent Court, due to the case pending in the German Federal Constitutional Court. In the meantime, the UPC Preparatory Committee is using the additional time available to prepare the functionality of the Court.

Chairman Alexander Ramsay has written this in a message on the website of the Preparatory Committee: Summing up and Looking Forward to 2018.

In his message, Ramsay explains that parts of the preparatory work for the UPC can only be concluded in the final phase of the project known as ‘provisional application’ and why this period is important.

‘The Agreement on the Unified Patent Court (UPCA) doesn’t include a provision enabling the Court to have a pilot phase during which the organisation as such is established but the Court is not yet operational. To remedy this situation the Signatory States agreed the Protocol to the Agreement on a Unified Patent court on provisional application. The protocol means that the State Parties agree to apply the institutional, organisational and financial parts of the UPCA provisionally before the UPCA enters into force.

Once the Protocol enters into force the organisation as such will therefore be created and acquire legal personality. The Administrative Committee, the Budget Committee and the Advisory Committee will be established at the start of provisional application and will then take over the responsibility of the preparations from the Preparatory Committee.

During the provisional application phase the organisation will be able to conclude necessary agreements with third parties and formalise all the preparatory work done by the Preparatory Committee. One hugely important area that cannot be conducted before the provisional application phase is the completion of the recruitment of the judges. Once the judges are appointed the two Presidents can be elected, the Presidium can be set up and the Registrar and the Deputy Registrar can be appointed.’

In September, the UPC Preparatory Committee announced it was ‘very close to the 13 required ratifications of the Protocol on Provisional Application’ and it expects that operations of the UPC will begin with close to 20 contracting states.

According to Ramsay’s message the period of provisional application needs to be between six and eight months long. ‘Looking ahead to 2018 I am hopeful the New Year will bring closure to our endeavours and the Unified Patent Court will become a reality providing benefit of growth and European competitiveness.’

For regular updates on the Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court, subscribe to this blog and the free Kluwer IP Law Newsletter.


To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law

The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF

One comment

  1. I have rarely read anything bordering so much on self-suggestion, but the poor chap cannot say anything different.

    If the complaint before the Federal Constitutional Court is dismissed, which is hard to believe, then may be towards the end of 2018, there might be some light at the end of the tunnel. But then we still have the Brexit problem, contrary to what Tilmann, Pors, Johnson and consorts may say.

    If the complaint before the FCC is admitted, which looks far more probable, you can add at least two to three years. But may be by then, the Brexit saga will have come to an end.

    That “the Unified Patent Court will become a reality providing benefit of growth and European competitiveness” is nothing but certain. A cool analysis of the real situation leads rather to a different conclusion. But some people, who have put a lot of efforts in it, would get their return on investment. I doubt this being to the benefit of growth, at least for Europe at large.

    Which ever way one looks at the UPC, its future is not very bright. There is too much uncertainty at the moment, and probably in the future. And investors hate uncertainty. This should not be forgotten by anybody praising the UPC.

    To all bloggers and commenters, a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, irrespective of the UPC!

    Techrights: fingers off!!

Comments are closed.