Another significant delay – or even more substantial – trouble seems to be ahead of the Unitary Patent system, due to today’s decision of the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) in Karlsruhe. The Bundesverfassungsgericht has requested the German President not to sign the bills already approved by Bundestag and Bundesrat on the ratification of the Unitary Patent system.

This has been reported by Hendrik Wieduwilt of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, who I would consider a reliable source. Mr Wieduwilt says the news was confirmed by the press offices of the Bundesverfassungsgericht and the German presidency. According to his report, an unknown private person is behind the complaint against the UP system for infringing the German Consitution.

My own interpretation (and at this point this is mere speculation, but too tempting not to mention it!) is that the Bundesverfassungsgericht’s request to the President is based on the pending constitutional appeals against the EPO on which I wrote earlier in this blog. If the Bundesverfassungsgerichts is of the preliminary view that any of the pending four constitutional complaints may have merit, it would make eminent sense to request the President, at least for the time being, not to sign the UPCA ratification bills and first await the Federal Constitutional Court’s decision on these appeals, in order not to create faits accomplis. The decisions on these four appeals are expected later this year, but an exact point in time has not yet been defined.

The immediate consequence of the Bundesverfassungsgericht’s request will be a further delay in the ratification of the UPCA by at least a few months. Germany is one of the three member states that has to ratify before the system can be launched.

And if the Constitutional Appeals are found to have merit, then the delay will be pretty substantial, in my opinion. Namely, if the current EPO system is found to violate the constitutional right to a judicial review of a decision of an office, the EPO system will have to be changed much more fundamentally than by the previous reforms (who were by many considered to be a fig leaf only) and a truly independent judiciary will need to be established. If so, I would expect the Bundesverfassungsgericht to set generous transitional terms, yet I doubt that it would consider the UPCA constitutional before this reform has been actually implemented.

We will probably know more by tomorrow when reports on the reasoning of the Bundesverfassungsgericht’s request are likely to appear.

I would like to express my special gratitude to our indefatigable Kluwer News Blogger, who alerted me to this piece of news. Stay tuned for more in the next couple of days!


To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law

The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF

One comment

  1. This is good: specialized patent-justice means extra patent-troubles.
    The court of eggs, will find eggs everywhere.

Comments are closed.