The federal district court in Wilmington, Delaware, did not abuse its discretion in finding that Bayer CropScience’s infringement suit against agrochemical rival Dow AgroSciences over soybean gene technology qualified as an “exceptional case” warranting an award of attorney fees under Section 285 of the Patent Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held. Dow’s commercial exploitation of the patents was authorized under the terms of a license between Bayer and a third-party. The district court properly examined the totality of circumstances in finding that Bayer’s litigation conduct and its weak legal positions made the case exceptional (Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, March 17, 2017, Stoll, K.).

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law


To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law

The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF