The objection raised by the opponent that the protected subject matter of a divisional application extends beyond the content of the parent application does not represent a “fresh ground for opposition”,. This bbecause in the present case i.c. the opposition division hadhas earlier raised an unrelated objection earlier, holdinstating that the patent based on the divisional application extends beyond the parentdivisional parent application, even though the original grounds of opposition concerned only inventive step. G 1/95 makes it clear that the alternatives mentioned in the ground for opposition under Article 100(c) EPC relate to a single legal basis on which an opposition can be based. Therefore, the new objection that the divisional application extends beyond the parent application can should be considered in the appeal proceedings stage without the approval of the patentee.

Click here  for the full text of this case.

A summary of this case will be posted on


To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law

The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF