By Giovanni Gozzo and David Nilsson
The Svea Court of Appeal partially invalidated the patent of respondent Dustcontrol, insofar as claim 1 of the patent was concerned. The Court held that it could not be deduced from claim 1 that the filter cartridge at issue in claim 1 must be a unit that neither can nor needs to be taken apart, as previously held by the District Court. The skilled person would consider both this and the option with a unit that can be taken apart possible and covered by the claim. In the end, the Court upheld an amended patent in accordance with Dustcontrol’s auxiliary request.
Click here for the full text of this case. A summary of this case will be posted on http://www.KluwerIPCases.com.
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.
Kluwer IP Law
The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?
Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.