The court held that the plaintiff who is listed as proprietor of the patent in the patent register is allowed to claim both injunctive relief and damages as well as claims to rendering accounts and provision of information to prepare the damage claim for all infringing acts committed during the time of his/her enlistment, despite the fact that the transfer of the patent (application) was not effective, because the German Patent Act allows for claims in one’s own name on behalf of third parties (“Prozessstandschaft”).

Furthermore functional features in a device claim have to be taken into account while determining the extent of protection of a patent.

For a stay of infringement proceedings until a final decision on the question of validity of the patent in suit the court has to examine whether the patent in suit is most likely to be revoked due to the prior art citations put forward.

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.


To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law

The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF