In preliminary injunction proceedings, the influential Barcelona Court of Appeal held that reasons of “congruence” bind the court to basing the assessment of inventive step strictly on the particular prior art document chosen as the closest prior art by the party challenging its validity, regardless of whether that choice is technically and objectively justified. This could kick start a worrisome trend in Spanish revocation proceedings that is deeply inimical to the proper application of the problem-solution approach. The Court also made findings on the impact of decisions of the Opposition Division on Spanish injunctions.

Case date: 27 December 2017
Case number: AUTO Nº 159/2017
Court: Court of Appeal of Barcelona

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.

 

 


_____________________________

To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.


Kluwer IP Law

The 2021 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 81% of the law firms expect to view technology as an important investment in their future ability to thrive. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF

One comment

  1. It would be nice if you said a bit more on the impact of decisions of the Opposition Division on Spanish injunctions.

Comments are closed.