The patent concerned claims a method of cooling animals characterized in that the animals are cooled in a milking stall so that the animals go to the milking stall spontaneously. The patentee added a disclaimer of therapeutic use. The claim covered only carrying out the invention on animals that are neither in a pathological state nor likely to develop one. The Board rejected the opponent’s argument that the claim still had to be excluded as a method of therapy because it would inevitably involve therapeutic aspects. ‘Therapy’ concerned bringing a body from a pathological state back into its normal healthy state or preventing a pathological state. Relief of discomfort is not considered as therapy per se.
Click here for the full text of this case.
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.
________________________
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf0d3/cf0d3a8b85ddfd9a58c10a41b284d1e437f17d0d" alt="Kluwer Arbitration"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fc20/4fc2069e8b7caa7b992a813b07f0691164ba3940" alt="This page as PDF"