The PTAB did not establish the existence of a motivation for a person of ordinary skill in the art to combine the aspects of existing patents and prior art.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has vacated and remanded a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board holding that a patent for an in-the-ear medical device was obvious in light of several other patents and prior art. To the contrary, the appellate court concluded that obviousness was not proven because the Board’s decision did not articulate a basis or rationale sufficient to show that a person of ordinary skill in the art would modify the devices existing under prior patents and prior art (In re Anova Hearing Labs, Inc., April 7, 2020, Moore, K.).

Case date: 07 April 2020
Case number: No. 19-1507
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.


_____________________________

To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.


Kluwer IP Law

The 2021 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 81% of the law firms expect to view technology as an important investment in their future ability to thrive. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF