In case of actual or potential discrepancies between claim language and the patent description which might allow a broader interpretation the Supreme Court confirms that the claim may not be interpreted to cover all options of the broader description if certain elements of the description have not been reflected in the claim language. Furthermore, such disclosure cannot be brought within the scope of the claims by way of equivalence.

Click here  for the full text of this case.

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.


Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF