In this decision the EBoA held that sexually crossing of plants is an ‘essential biological process’ within the meaning of Art. 53(b) EPC. Any claim that contains a step of sexually crossing therefore falls within the exception to patentability, whether or not additional technical measures (e.g. selecting) would be present.

Only if a claim relates to a process wherein the actual step of transferring genetic material is of a technical nature and not the result of a normal sexual crossing, such a claim escapes the exclusion, and will then be judged on compliance with the other requirements under the EPC.

Click here for the full text of this case.

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.


To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law