The Higher Regional Court of Vienna confirmed the three-factor Bicalutamid/Schneidmesser Test, holding that a variant is equivalent to an invention for the purposes of infringement if the following conditions apply cumulatively:

1 The modified embodiment solves the problem using modified, but objectively equivalent means (equivalent effect);

2 The person skilled in the art is able to infer the alternative means, based on his expert knowledge, as having an equivalent effect with regard to the solution of the problem (obviousness);

3 The considerations of the person skilled in the art are oriented towards the meaning of the technical teaching protected by the patent in such a way as to ensure that the person skilled in the art will take the alternative embodiment into consideration as an equivalent solution to the patented embodiment (“equivalence” or “parity”).

Case date: 14 April 2018
Case number: 133 R 15/18f
Court: Higher Regional Court of Vienna

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.



To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law

The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF