by Bernward Zollner
In a case called “Produktionsrückstandsentsorgung” the German Bundesgerichtshof has discussed a case in which the claim of the litigious patent had been amended and narrowed with respect to the scope of protection after the judgment of the appeal court had been handed down. The appeal court therefore, could not have discussed the amendment in the infringement judgment (in which an infringement was assumed). The appeal court had not admitted the further appeal (Revision). While the complaint against the non-admission of the further appeal was pending at the German Bundesgerichtshof the patent’s claim was amended and restricted by the German Bundespatentgericht. Although the German Bundesgerichtshof does normally not deal with factual issues in the proceeding concerning the complaint against the non-admission of the further appeal, in this particular case the attacked embodiment was indeed considered with respect to the changed patent. The Bundesgerichshof had come to the conclusion that the amendment of the claim is not relevant with respect to the infringement and had dismissed defendant’s complaint. For this conclusion the court had relied on the undisputed factual findings of the appeal court (cf. GRUR 2010, 272).
_____________________________
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Patent Blog, please subscribe here.
Kluwer IP Law
The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?
Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.
